← Back to all organisations

Credit Review Office

The Credit Review Office reviewed certain credit decisions of participating institutions. A provision in the Finance Act 2011 records that the office had been established under guidelines issued under section 210 of the National Asset Management Agency Act 2009.

The Credit Review Act 2026 established a body known as An tSeirbhís um Athbhreithniú Creidmheasa, with a chief executive called the Credit Reviewer, to review certain credit decisions, and it repeals section 210 of the 2009 Act. S.I. No. 296/2026 appointed 1 July 2026 as the establishment day. The 2026 Act substitutes that Irish name for references to the Credit Review Office in other instruments.

10 spending records on file.

Transparency Score

3.1/5

62% transparent

Machine readable 0.0/1

Descriptions 1.0/1

Uniqueness 0.6/1

Supplier number 0.5/1

Supplier name 1.0/1

Help improve transparency

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Publication	Amount
30 Mar 2024	Mediavest Ltd	Media Buying	Purchase Order	Q1 2024	€20,484
30 Jun 2024	Mediavest Ltd	Media Buying	Purchase Order	Q2 2024	€21,587
30 Jun 2025	Mediavest Ltd	Media Buying	Purchase Order	Q2 2025	€21,990
30 Dec 2024	Mediavest Ltd	Media Buying	Purchase Order	Q4 2024	€23,157
30 Dec 2025	Mediavest Ltd	Media Buying	Purchase Order	Q4 2025	€23,900
31 Mar 2026	Mediavest Ltd	G15511 — Mediavest Ltd	Purchase Order	Q1 2026	€20,484
31 Mar 2026	Mediavest Ltd	G17169 — Mediavest Ltd	Purchase Order	Q1 2026	€21,587
31 Mar 2026	Mediavest Ltd	G18507 — Mediavest Ltd	Purchase Order	Q1 2026	€23,157
31 Mar 2026	Mediavest Ltd	G19580 — Mediavest Ltd	Purchase Order	Q1 2026	€21,990
31 Mar 2026	Mediavest Ltd	G21160 — Mediavest Ltd	Purchase Order	Q1 2026	€23,900

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues

Credit Review Office

Transparency Score

Spending per quarter

Publications