Purchase Orders Over €20,000 Q1 2019

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
31 Mar 2019	Pitney Bowes Ireland Ltd	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€20,195.37
31 Mar 2019	PFH Technology Group	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€68,060.82
31 Mar 2019	Oracle EMEA Limited	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€32,752.24
31 Mar 2019	Oracle EMEA Limited	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€196,117.69
31 Mar 2019	Micromail.	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€1,089,481.64
31 Mar 2019	Micromail.	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€215,211.28
31 Mar 2019	Loughtec Ltd.	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€62,310.00
31 Mar 2019	Loop1 Systems	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€20,536.43
31 Mar 2019	Fujitsu Services Shared Services Centre	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€238,386.24
31 Mar 2019	Fujitsu Services Shared Services Centre	IT External Services	Purchase Order	€21,641.85
31 Mar 2019	Digital Imaging Services	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€36,285.00
31 Mar 2019	Digital Imaging Services	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€36,285.00
31 Mar 2019	Dell Computer (Ireland)	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€315,298.20
31 Mar 2019	Datapac Ltd	Computer Equipment	Purchase Order	€26,026.80
31 Mar 2019	Colorman (Ireland) Limited	Stationery	Purchase Order	€107,417.13
31 Mar 2019	Actian Europe Limited	Software Operating Leases and Maintenance	Purchase Order	€36,398.46

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues