Purchase Orders Over €20,000 Q2 2017

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
30 Jun 2017	BAT CONSERVATION IRELAND	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€20,000.00
30 Jun 2017	CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE	Voluntary Bog Purchase Scheme	Purchase Order	€21,297.00
30 Jun 2017	BIGOMEDIA	2016 Project Office	Purchase Order	€21,434.60
30 Jun 2017	CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE	Voluntary Bog Purchase Scheme	Purchase Order	€22,067.01
30 Jun 2017	BIGOMEDIA	2016 Project Office	Purchase Order	€22,707.28
30 Jun 2017	BEC CONSULTANTS LTD	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€24,600.00
30 Jun 2017	ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENTAL	Provision of scientific support on raised bog conservation	Purchase Order	€24,965.99
30 Jun 2017	CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE	Voluntary Bog Purchase Scheme	Purchase Order	€29,478.51
30 Jun 2017	BIGOMEDIA	2016 Project Office	Purchase Order	€30,300.44
30 Jun 2017	BORD NA MONA PLC	Services provided in the context of relocation under the cessation of Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme	Purchase Order	€30,354.76
30 Jun 2017	DR EVELYN MOORKENS	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€30,540.90
30 Jun 2017	CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE	Land purchase	Purchase Order	€32,400.00
30 Jun 2017	BORD NA MONA PLC	Services provided in the context of relocation under the cessation of Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme	Purchase Order	€36,088.02
30 Jun 2017	BEC CONSULTANTS LTD	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€36,900.00
30 Jun 2017	J BRENDAN QUIGLEY & CO SOLRS	Legal fees	Purchase Order	€38,500.01
30 Jun 2017	BORD NA MONA PLC	Services provided in the context of relocation under the cessation of Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme	Purchase Order	€39,617.54
30 Jun 2017	BORD NA MONA PLC	Services provided in the context of relocation under the cessation of Turf Cutting Compensation Scheme	Purchase Order	€41,340.50
30 Jun 2017	ESRI IRELAND	Ecological Support	Purchase Order	€41,491.59
30 Jun 2017	ESRI IRELAND	GIS & Data Ecological Support	Purchase Order	€41,491.59
30 Jun 2017	ESRI IRELAND	GIS & Data Ecological Support	Purchase Order	€41,491.59
30 Jun 2017	CHIEF STATE SOLICITOR'S OFFICE	Voluntary Bog Purchase Scheme	Purchase Order	€41,743.80
30 Jun 2017	AQUAFACT INTL SERVICES LTD	Coastal Lagoon Monitoring Programme	Purchase Order	€44,082.59
30 Jun 2017	RPSGROUP BELFAST	Provision of expert scientific and technical services	Purchase Order	€53,643.99
30 Jun 2017	SLR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING IRE LTD.	Provision of expert services	Purchase Order	€61,347.48
30 Jun 2017	BAT CONSERVATION IRELAND	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€61,762.50
30 Jun 2017	RPSGROUP BELFAST	Provision of expert scientific and technical services	Purchase Order	€75,600.47
30 Jun 2017	BIRDWATCH IRELAND	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€79,780.77
30 Jun 2017	MARINE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS	Wildlife/Conservation Survey	Purchase Order	€113,298.78
30 Jun 2017	CCJV COMPANY LTD	2016 Project Office	Purchase Order	€351,705.86
30 Jun 2017	CCJV COMPANY LTD	2016 Project Office	Purchase Order	€404,778.43
30 Jun 2017	RTE COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD	2016 Project Office	Purchase Order	€500,000.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues