Purchase Orders Over €20,000 Q3 2016

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
30 Sep 2016	The Central Bank Payroll	Euro Current Secondee costs	Purchase Order	€28,571.06
30 Sep 2016	Shared Services Vote	( SSOF) 48,632.46 Peoplepoint HR administration charge	Purchase Order	€311.00
30 Sep 2016	Philip Baker	QC Legal Fees	Purchase Order	€20,947.75
30 Sep 2016	Houses of the Oireachtas	Com ( 23,050.00 Electricity Q2	Purchase Order	€604.00
30 Sep 2016	Datapac	IT hardware upgrades	Purchase Order	€35,229.05
30 Sep 2016	Arthur Cox	Advisory Fees	Purchase Order	€26,126.23
30 Sep 2016	Arthur Cox	Advisory Fees	Purchase Order	€22,600.02

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues