Purchase Orders Over €20,000 Q1 2025

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
28 Jan 2025	Wexford County Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€35,938.60
28 Jan 2025	Wicklow County Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
28 Jan 2025	Cork City Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€32,675.40
23 Jan 2025	Marsh Ireland	Insurance	Purchase Order	€31,166.32
23 Jan 2025	Aramark	FEM	Purchase Order	€79,152.65
20 Jan 2025	Viatel	ICT	Purchase Order	€21,277.46
20 Jan 2025	Dublin City Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€32,311.80
15 Jan 2025	Fingal County Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
15 Jan 2025	Dublin City Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
15 Jan 2025	Kildare Couny Council	SHD Refund	Purchase Order	€27,424.40
13 Jan 2025	Bord Na Mona	SID Refund	Purchase Order	€24,612.00
13 Jan 2025	Crown Records Management	Archive	Purchase Order	€20,276.91
08 Jan 2025	Aramark	FEM	Purchase Order	€52,016.24
08 Jan 2025	Eirgrid	SID Refund	Purchase Order	€24,383.50
08 Jan 2025	ESB Enterprise Services	SID Refund	Purchase Order	€78,295.00
08 Jan 2025	Mill Farm Solar Ltd	SID Refund	Purchase Order	€87,427.00
24 Sep 2018	Micromail	IT	Purchase Order	€22,666.92
12 Sep 2018	BNP Paribas	Rent	Purchase Order	€312,500.00
04 Sep 2018	PWC	IT	Purchase Order	€26,737.83
27 Aug 2018	Dun Laoghaire/Rathdown	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
20 Aug 2018	Opensky	IT	Purchase Order	€18,411.25
20 Aug 2018	Ardstone Homes	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€58,514.00
20 Aug 2018	Opensky	IT	Purchase Order	€20,600.00
07 Aug 2018	NPHDB	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€26,310.00
07 Aug 2018	Planree	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€27,776.00
30 Jul 2018	Dun Laoghaire/Rathdown	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€35,876.00
23 Jul 2018	Kildare County Council	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€26,930.00
23 Jul 2018	Kildare County Council	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
06 Jul 2018	S Geaney	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€45,167.50
02 Jul 2018	Micromail	IT	Purchase Order	€21,506.34
02 Jul 2018	PWC	IT	Purchase Order	€37,877.85
11 Jun 2018	BNP Paribas	Rent	Purchase Order	€312,500.00
05 Jun 2018	eBECS Business Solutions	IT	Purchase Order	€32,431.88
21 May 2018	PWC	IT	Purchase Order	€41,206.88
21 May 2018	PWC	IT	Purchase Order	€37,661.13
21 May 2018	Micromail	IT	Purchase Order	€21,032.58
21 May 2018	Microsoft	IT	Purchase Order	€35,335.44
08 May 2018	South Dublin County Council	-17 Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€39,190.00
30 Apr 2018	Dublin City Council	-17 Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
30 Apr 2018	Cork County Council	-17 Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
30 Apr 2018	Kildare County Council	-18 Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€36,186.80
23 Apr 2018	Wexford County Council	Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€30,000.00
16 Apr 2018	eBECS Business Solutions	IT	Purchase Order	€45,948.32
10 Apr 2018	eBECS Business Solutions	IT	Purchase Order	€282,054.74
03 Apr 2018	Dublin City Council	300492-17 Fee Refund	Purchase Order	€38,907.84
21 Dec 2017	Pricewaterhouse Coopers	IT	Purchase Order	€48,079.10
14 Dec 2017	PWC	IT	Purchase Order	€54,630.57
14 Dec 2017	Westmeath County Council	Refund	Purchase Order	€34,543.50
13 Dec 2017	BNP Paribas	Rent	Purchase Order	€312,500.00
04 Dec 2017	Opensky	IT	Purchase Order	€31,930.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues