← Back to all organisations

National Council for Special Education

268 spending records on file.

Transparency Score

3.6/5

72% transparent

Machine readable 0.0/1

Descriptions 0.9/1

Uniqueness 0.7/1

Supplier number 1.0/1

Supplier name 1.0/1

Help improve transparency

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Publication	Amount
30 Sep 2021	University of Limerick	Speech and language therapists	Purchase Order	Q3 2021	€46,979.85
30 Sep 2021	Office of Public Works	Rent	Purchase Order	Q3 2021	€126,900.50
30 Jun 2021	Office of Public Works	Furniture	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€20,000.00
30 Jun 2021	Navan Education Centre	Rent	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€20,800.00
30 Jun 2021	Version 1 Software	IT applications	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€21,082.20
30 Jun 2021	National Council for the Blind	IT hardware	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€21,925.31
30 Jun 2021	Nesta Kylemore	Rent	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€27,099.50
30 Jun 2021	University of Limerick	Occupational therapists	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€21,442.85
30 Jun 2021	Eversheds Sutherland	Legal fees	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€20,203.37
30 Jun 2021	Eir	Phone costs	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€24,559.39
30 Jun 2021	Storm Technology Ltd	IT support	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€48,356.78
30 Jun 2021	Office of Public Works	Rent	Purchase Order	Q2 2021	€137,205.10
31 Mar 2021	Office of Public Works	Furniture	Purchase Order	Q1 2021	€20,000.00
31 Mar 2021	NEPS	Rent	Purchase Order	Q1 2021	€20,003.87
31 Mar 2021	Eir	Phone costs	Purchase Order	Q1 2021	€26,086.43
31 Mar 2021	Nesta Kylemore	Rent	Purchase Order	Q1 2021	€37,669.36
31 Mar 2021	Office of Public Works	Rent	Purchase Order	Q1 2021	€133,296.70
31 Mar 2021	University College Dublin	Training programme	Purchase Order	Q1 2021	€350,000.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues

National Council for Special Education

Transparency Score

Spending per quarter