← Back to all organisations

Department of Justice

9163 spending records on file.

Transparency Score

3.2/5

64% transparent

Machine readable 0.2/1

Descriptions 1.0/1

Uniqueness 0.0/1

Supplier number 1.0/1

Supplier name 1.0/1

Help improve transparency

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Publication	Amount
31 Mar 2016	ATOS IT SOLUTIONS & SERVICES LTD	IT Maintenance and Support	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€95,745.35
31 Mar 2016	ONSITE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€100,594.86
31 Mar 2016	CLONEA STRAND HOTEL LTD	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€1,419,600.00
31 Mar 2016	ONSITE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€74,515.10
31 Mar 2016	DELOITTE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LTD	IT Maintenance and Support	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€36,719.19
31 Mar 2016	EAST COAST CATERING	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€313,600.00
31 Mar 2016	OSCAR DAWN LTD	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€533,120.00
31 Mar 2016	FAZYARD LTD NOS 1&2	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€933,240.00
31 Mar 2016	MAISON BUILDERS LTD	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€512,366.40
31 Mar 2016	BT COMMUNICATIONS IRELAND LTD	ICT Services	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€57,277.00
31 Mar 2016	MANGUARD PLUS LTD	Building Security	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€23,452.93
31 Mar 2016	MO BHAILE	Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Support and Maintenance	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€166,320.00
31 Mar 2016	NOONAN SERVICES GROUP	Building Security	Purchase Order	Q1 2016	€101,445.04

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues

Department of Justice

Transparency Score

Spending per quarter